The Wrongfulness and The Goodness Of Euthanasia
The Wrongfulness Of EuthanasiaEuthanasia is the termination of life, which to most is morally wrong, as it is an act against the interests of human beings or animals. Additionally, it is feared that if the approach is legalized, it will expose susceptible individuals to the pressure of wanting to die. However, from a practical perspective, the approach allows individuals to undergo dignified death at a chosen time, making them peaceful. Most terminally ill patients undergo a lot of pain, as well as the loss of dignity and the anticipation of a slow and painful death. The Goodness Of EuthanasiaAlthough death is a private issue that does not require government interference, assisting the death per se is not permissible in most nations. However, death may be a good thing for some individuals due to their state of health. Additionally, it may prove beneficial for relatives, the sick individual, and other guardians as well (Ash). Mostly, patients that qualify for euthanasia have undergone coma for long durations, those with terminal ailments, or even infants with severe mutations. Although it may sound cruel to want to end the life of an individual, it is essential to consider the burden under which guardians go through. To prolong the life of an individual who is terminally ill might sometimes present costly burdens that may result in suicide of guardian due to stress.